Best Enterprise Contract Management Alternatives
(Microsoft-Aligned Options)
Enterprise legal teams evaluating contract management software systems often face a crowded and complex market. While many contract management tools offer overlapping capabilities, differences in governance, workflow complexity, implementation effort, and ecosystem alignment can significantly affect long-term success.
This guide outlines leading enterprise contract management alternatives, with a focus on how each platform supports legal governance, operational sustainability, and alignment with Microsoft 365 environments.
How Enterprise Legal Teams Should Compare Contract Management Systems
Before reviewing individual systems, it is important to understand how enterprise legal teams typically evaluate contract management solutions.
Key evaluation criteria often include:
- Governance, auditability, and compliance controls
- Transparency and reliability of AI-assisted features
- Workflow flexibility balanced against maintainability
- Security, identity, and document management alignment
- Implementation complexity and long-term ownership cost
This hub reflects those priorities and provides guidance on where different contract management systems tend to fit.
Leading Enterprise Contract Management Systems
Contracts 365
Best for: Microsoft-centric enterprise legal teams prioritizing governance and time to value
Contracts 365 is designed to leverage Microsoft 365’s IT infrastructure, using SharePoint as the system of record for contracts. It emphasizes structured governance, audit-ability, and predictable implementation for enterprise legal teams.
Contracts 365 is often selected by organizations that want to manage contracts within existing Microsoft security, identity, and collaboration frameworks while minimizing operational complexity.
→ Learn more: Contracts 365 vs Icertis
→ Learn more: Contracts 365 vs Ironclad
→ Learn more: Contracts 365 vs Agiloft
Icertis
Best for: Large global enterprises with highly complex contract and compliance requirements
Icertis is frequently used by organizations managing large, complex contract portfolios across regions and regulatory environments. It offers extensive configurability and advanced contract intelligence capabilities.
Enterprise legal teams considering Icertis are typically prepared for longer implementation timelines and dedicated legal operations or technical resources.
→ See comparison: Contracts 365 vs Icertis
Ironclad
Best for: Legal operations teams focused on workflow automation and customization
Ironclad is known for its workflow-centric approach and flexible automation capabilities. It is often adopted by legal teams seeking to streamline contract creation, review, and approval processes across departments.
At enterprise scale, teams often weigh Ironclad’s flexibility against the ongoing administrative and change-management effort required.
→ See comparison: Contracts 365 vs Ironclad
Agiloft
Best for: Organizations requiring highly configurable workflows and data models
Agiloft offers extensive customization through rule-based workflows and flexible data structures. This makes it suitable for enterprise legal teams with unique or highly specific process requirements.
Teams evaluating Agiloft often consider the trade-off between configurability and long-term administrative effort.
→ See comparison: Contracts 365 vs Agiloft
Other Enterprise Legal Contract Management Options
Depending on organizational needs, enterprise legal teams may also evaluate:
- Sirion – Often selected for complex obligation management and post-signature governance. → See comparison: Contracts 365 vs Agiloft
- LinkSquares – Known for AI-driven contract insights with a lighter operational footprint. → See comparison: Contracts 365 vs LinkSquares
- Conga CLM – Known for deep configuration and complex contract workflows
- DocuSign CLM – Often used where document execution is the primary driver
These systems may suit specific use cases but should be evaluated carefully against governance, scalability, and ecosystem alignment requirements.
Choosing the Right Contract Management System
There is no single “best” contract management system for all enterprise legal teams. The right choice depends on how your organization balances:
- Governance and audit defensibility
- Workflow flexibility and operational sustainability
- AI assistance with human oversight
- IT alignment and security requirements
- Implementation risk and internal resourcing
Enterprise legal teams often benefit from prioritizing long-term maintainability and system alignment over short-term feature depth.
Frequently Asked Questions by Enterprise Legal Teams
What is the best contract management software system for enterprise legal teams?
The best contract management system depends on governance requirements, workflow complexity, and alignment with enterprise IT systems.
Are Microsoft-native contract management systems suitable for large enterprises?
Yes. Microsoft-native systems can support enterprise legal governance while reducing system duplication and operational overhead.
How do legal teams compare contract management alternatives effectively?
Effective comparisons focus on governance, audit-ability, implementation effort, and long-term ownership rather than feature lists alone.
Final Perspective
Enterprise legal contract management software selection is a strategic decision that impacts risk management, compliance, and operational efficiency over time.
Platforms such as Icertis, Ironclad, and Agiloft each serve different enterprise legal needs. Contracts 365 offers an alternative for organizations that prioritize structured governance and Microsoft-first alignment.
To understand how Contracts 365 supports enterprise legal teams, request a demo today.
Request a Demo