Contracts 365 vs. Agiloft

Executive Summary

How Enterprise Legal Teams Evaluate Contract Management Systems

Enterprise legal teams evaluate contract management software systems based on their ability to support governance, reduce risk, and remain sustainable over time.

Key evaluation areas typically include:

• Legal governance and compliance controls
• Reliability and transparency of AI-assisted functionality
• Workflow flexibility balanced against administrative overhead
• Security, identity, and document management alignment
• Implementation effort and long-term ownership requirements

This comparison reflects those enterprise legal priorities.

Quick Comparison Overview

Legal Governance & Compliance

Both Contracts 365 and Agiloft provide governance capabilities designed to support enterprise legal oversight and compliance requirements.

Contracts 365 emphasizes governance through:

• SharePoint-native version control and document history
• Role-based permissions and approval workflows
• Audit trails aligned with Microsoft security and compliance models

Agiloft supports governance through:

• Configurable data models and approval logic
• Detailed audit logs and reporting
• Rule-based enforcement across contract processes

Both platforms support enterprise governance needs, with differences primarily in how governance is configured and administered over time.

AI Capabilities for Legal Teams

In enterprise legal environments, AI capabilities are typically evaluated based on assistive value, accuracy, and explainability, rather than full automation.

Contracts 365 uses AI to assist with:

• Contract metadata extraction and negotiation
• Contract classification and insights
• Obligation visibility within Microsoft-based workflows

Agiloft offers AI-assisted functionality focused on:

• Data extraction and classification
• Rule-based automation support
• Enhancing contract review and reporting processes

For enterprise legal teams, the distinction lies in how AI supports controlled review and operational consistency

Workflow Design & Operational Complexity

Workflow design plays a central role inlong-term contract management success for enterprise legal teams.

Agiloft is known for:

• Highly configurable workflows and data structures
• Extensive rule-based logic
• Flexibility to adapt to unique legal processes

This level of configurability can be valuable but often requires dedicated administrative resources to maintain and evolve.

Contracts 365 focuses on:

• Structured, repeatable workflows
• Legal control with lower administrative overhead
• Easier long-term maintenance within Microsoft 365 environments

The trade-off is typically maximum configurability versus sustainable operational simplicity.

Microsoft 365 & Enterprise IT Alignment

Microsoft 365 alignment is an important consideration for enterprise legal and IT teams.

Contracts 365 operates natively within Microsoft 365, including:

• SharePoint as the document system of record
• Microsoft identity, security, and access controls
• Contracts and related data stored within your existing Microsoft tenant

Agiloft operates as a standalone platform with integrations into Microsoft tools, but contract data and workflows are managed outside the native SharePoint environment.

For organizations standardized on Microsoft 365, native alignment can reduce system duplication, simplify access management, and lower operational risk.

Implementation, Ownership & Time to Value

Implementation and ownership expectations differ between the two platforms.

Agiloft implementations often involve:

• Initial configuration of data models and workflows
• Ongoing administrative management
• Legal operations or IT resources dedicated to maintenance

Contracts 365 implementations are typically:

• Faster for Microsoft-centric organizations
• More predictable in rollout
• Easier to manage using existing IT and legal operations resources

These differences often reflect organizational preferences for flexibility versus operational efficiency.

Which Platform Is the Better Fit for Enterprise Legal Teams?

Contracts 365 is often a strong fit if:

• You require highly customized workflows and data models
• Rule-based automation is a priority
• Dedicated legal operations or IT administrators are available
• Greater administrative complexity is acceptable

Agiloft may be a better fit if:

• You require highly customized workflows and data models
• Rule-based automation is a priority
• Dedicated legal operations or IT administrators are available
• Greater administrative complexity is acceptable

Frequently Asked Questions by Enterprise Legal Teams

Is Contracts 365 suitable for enterprise legal teams?
Yes. Contracts 365 supports enterprise legal teams that require governance, audit-ability, and scalability within Microsoft-based environments.

Is Agiloft highly configurable?
Agiloft is known for its flexibility in workflow and data model configuration, which can be valuable for complex legal processes.

How do the platforms differ in administrative effort?
Agiloft typically requires more ongoing administrative involvement, while Contracts 365 emphasizes lower operational overhead within Microsoft 365.

How do enterprise legal teams typically choose between these platforms?
The decision often depends on the balance between required configurability and long-term maintainability.

Final Perspective

Both Contracts 365 and Agiloft are capable enterprise Contract Management Software Systems used by legal teams to manage contracts and compliance at scale.

The right choice depends on whether your organization prioritizes extensive configurability or operational consistency within Microsoft 365.

To understand how Contracts 365 supports enterprise legal teams, request a demo today.